Top 10 thesis writing mistakes

Submitting a thesis is one of the most significant moments of any researcher’s academic life. Yet even the most meticulous scholars routinely overlook the same set of errors. Based on patterns I have encountered while proofreading theses in Ireland, here are my top ten thesis writing mistakes — and what to do about each one…

1. Weak or missing signposting

Examiners and academic supervisors read lengthy theses under considerable time pressure. Without clear signposting – chapter introductions that map what will follow, transition sentences that link one section to the next, and brief summaries at the close of each chapter – even the strongest thesis writing can feel incoherent. Signposting is not padding; it is the glue that makes a thesis readable and allows the reader to follow your argument.

1. Hedging language gone wild

Humility in thesis writing is appropriate; verbal paralysis is not. Phrases like “it could perhaps be argued that it might possibly suggest” pile on the qualifications until the writer appears to have no actual position or is merely fudging the issue.

Fix it: Good hedging is precise—for example, “the data suggest” rather than “the data prove”.

 

thesis writing

Photo by Cottonbro Studio on Pexels.com

3. Overuse of the passive voice

Irish thesis writing culture has long favoured the passive voice as a marker of scholarly objectivity. The result is prose so distanced from its own findings that it becomes unreadable. Phrases like “it was found that” and “data were collected by the researcher” drain energy and conviction from arguments that deserve to be made clearly and directly. While the passive is appropriate in the Methodology section of your thesis, it should never dominate an entire chapter.

Fix it: “It was determined by the researcher that…” → “I found that…” or “The analysis shows…”

4. Inconsistent referencing style

Switching between APA, Harvard, and Chicago within the same project is far more common in thesis writing than you might expect. Inconsistencies also appear in punctuation, the treatment of page numbers, and how academic texts are cited. Irish universities typically specify a house style, but students often pull references from different sources and fail to standardise them before submitting their work.

Fix it: Run every reference through a citation manager (Google Scholar, Zotero, Mendeley) and check the final list of references against your institution’s style guide.

5. Tense shifts in thesis writing

A literature review that drifts between present and past tense – sometimes within the same paragraph – signals a lack of thesis-writing focus and editorial control. The convention is straightforward: use the present tense to discuss what scholars argue and the past tense to describe what your study found.

 

people studying in the library

Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko on Pexels.com

6. Comma splices and run-on sentences

Complex academic ideas often encourage writers to keep adding clauses when writing a thesis. The result is sentences that run far beyond the reader’s ability to track them. Comma splices — joining two independent clauses with only a comma — are particularly frequent in Irish postgraduate theses and are rarely caught by spell-checkers.

Fix it: “The data were robust, they supported all three hypotheses.” → “The data were robust; they supported all three hypotheses.” Or split it into two sentences.

7. Misuse of “acknowledge” and similar reporting verbs in thesis writing

One of the most common mistakes I encounter in Irish thesis writing is the misuse of reporting verbs. A sentence like “Smith (2021) acknowledges that cognitive behavioural therapy is not the only treatment for depression” wrongly implies that Smith was admitting something when the writer simply meant that Smith noted or stated it. Choosing the right verb matters far more than most students realise.

Fix it: Reserve “acknowledges” for when an author is conceding a limitation or opposing point. Use “states”, “notes”, or “argues” for straightforward reporting.

8. Inconsistent terminology and abbreviations

A term introduced as “cognitive load theory” in Chapter Two that later reappears throughout the thesis as other terms, such as “CLT”, then “cognitive load”, then simply “the theory”, creates unnecessary confusion due to its sheer inconsistency. Abbreviations should be defined once on first use and then applied consistently. The same concept should use the same name throughout the entire document.

 

thesis writing

Photo by Min An on Pexels.com

9. The mysterious “This” in thesis writing

Never start a sentence with the word “This” without specifying what you are referring to. When you use a pronoun without an antecedent, the reader is left guessing.

Fix it: Always add a noun: “This result suggests…” or “This pattern suggests…” It is a small change that makes a considerable difference to clarity.

10. The Irish conditional habit in thesis writing

The Irish have a conversational habit of speaking in the conditional tense where the indicative is required. This habit frequently creeps into thesis writing. “The data would suggest…” or “It would appear that…” are weaker than “The data suggest…” and “It appears that…” Write what is, not what would be.

Fix it: “The results would indicate…” → “The results indicate…”

Read my comprehensive guide to writing a thesis here

Links

Grammarly: This free online writing assistant is very helpful for thesis proofreading projects. It also has a premium version. An excellent second pair of eyes for any writing project.

Google Scholar is a free search engine. It has a large collection of scholarly texts, like articles, theses, and books, from many fields.